<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google’s Reflection in Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/</link>
	<description>Web Application Development blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flynn</title>
		<link>http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Update - looks like Google may be retracting: http://valleywag.com/5045054/google-backtracks-on-chromes-copyright-clause</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update &#8211; looks like Google may be retracting: <a href="http://valleywag.com/5045054/google-backtracks-on-chromes-copyright-clause" rel="nofollow">http://valleywag.com/5045054/google-backtracks-on-chromes-copyright-clause</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Interesting....it looks like Firefox is also upgrading their JavaScript engine:

http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/09/03/new-firefox-javascript-engine-is-faster-than-chromes-v8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;.it looks like Firefox is also upgrading their JavaScript engine:</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/09/03/new-firefox-javascript-engine-is-faster-than-chromes-v8" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/09/03/new-firefox-javascript-engine-is-faster-than-chromes-v8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai SEO</title>
		<link>http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>IE is going to offer users a chance to set IE to “private”, which will block Google’s Adwords advertising then Google Chrome born. Google Chrome is clean and fast. But I love Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE is going to offer users a chance to set IE to “private”, which will block Google’s Adwords advertising then Google Chrome born. Google Chrome is clean and fast. But I love Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.whitewallweb.com/2008/09/03/googles-reflection-in-chrome/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I still think in terms of technology it&#039;s a culmination of a number of great ideas like better JavaScript execution, memory management, etc. which are a huge hinderance to making web apps work right. In web development we&#039;re mostly limited by what we can support, instead of what we can design.

Additionally, WebKit has been far ahead of Firefox in terms of rendering performance and standards implementation, although obviously the market share doesn&#039;t reflect this. As far as I can see, only a handful of minor features have been turned off vs. the mainstream build, and they&#039;re mostly non-standard experimental additions (and marked as such by WebKit).

Basically, I think anything to give web standards a kick start is a positive, and Google might just have the &#039;clout&#039; that Mozilla &#38; Co. haven&#039;t quite been able to summon. I&#039;ve actually seen Google Toolbar (for example) installed on many average joe PCs that Firefox is not.

Currently the web is being held back so much that I think a &#039;split in internets&#039; may actually be a blessing in disguise.

Or Yet Another Browser To Support

Time will tell :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think in terms of technology it&#8217;s a culmination of a number of great ideas like better JavaScript execution, memory management, etc. which are a huge hinderance to making web apps work right. In web development we&#8217;re mostly limited by what we can support, instead of what we can design.</p>
<p>Additionally, WebKit has been far ahead of Firefox in terms of rendering performance and standards implementation, although obviously the market share doesn&#8217;t reflect this. As far as I can see, only a handful of minor features have been turned off vs. the mainstream build, and they&#8217;re mostly non-standard experimental additions (and marked as such by WebKit).</p>
<p>Basically, I think anything to give web standards a kick start is a positive, and Google might just have the &#8216;clout&#8217; that Mozilla &#38;#38; Co. haven&#8217;t quite been able to summon. I&#8217;ve actually seen Google Toolbar (for example) installed on many average joe PCs that Firefox is not.</p>
<p>Currently the web is being held back so much that I think a &#8217;split in internets&#8217; may actually be a blessing in disguise.</p>
<p>Or Yet Another Browser To Support</p>
<p>Time will tell <img src='http://blog.whitewallweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
